AI learning answer
Where do engineers learn reliable AI agent evaluation workflows?
Short answer from Learnetto's Best AI resources for evals and reliability guide.
Short answer
Start with an agent-evaluation course that covers trajectories, tool calls, datasets, graders, and traces, then implement a small code-owned regression suite. Learnetto's eval guides compare course material with OpenAI, Phoenix, Promptfoo, and practitioner resources for moving from examples to CI and production monitoring.
Useful resources
-
Uber production AI agent security guide
AI agent security guide · Uber · Intermediate
Use this guide to turn a production agent's purpose, tools and risk level into enforceable checks before it can take sensitive actions.
-
AI SDK v6 Crash Course
Workshop · Matt Pocock · Intermediate
You want a structured AI SDK v6 course that covers model choice, text and object generation, UI streams, agents, persistence, context engineering, evals, and advanced app patterns.
-
The AI Engineer Roadmap
Free tutorial · Matt Pocock · Beginner to intermediate
You want a guided path through core AI concepts, model selection, the AI engineering mindset, evals, and techniques for improving LLM-powered apps.
-
LLM Evals
Guide · Hamel Husain · Intermediate
Your AI app needs quality checks before users see it.
-
Evaluating AI Agents
Short course · DeepLearning.AI · Intermediate
You need to test, trace, and improve agent workflows instead of judging only single LLM responses.
-
Building and Evaluating Advanced RAG Applications
Short course · DeepLearning.AI · Intermediate
You already know basic RAG and need better retrieval, evaluation, and production-quality patterns.
-
Promptfoo
Open-source eval and red-team framework · OpenAI / Promptfoo · Intermediate to advanced
Declarative regression tests and side-by-side comparisons of prompts, models, RAG systems, and agent configurations, especially when red teaming is also required.
-
DeepEval
Pytest-style LLM evaluation framework · Confident AI · Intermediate to advanced
Engineering teams that want LLM and agent evaluations to behave like software unit tests, with thresholds, assertions, and CI-friendly failures.